|
Subject: Re: Moderator welcomes known liar back to
the WC-show
[someone] wrote: [me, Sune:][someone:] Ah. So we are in fact discussing how many people make a "large" audience, and the size of the rooms Steiner gave lectures in in various cities. Just wanted to be sure I understood your criticisms.No, my basic criticism of Peter Staudenmaier concerns his reliability and truthfulness in a basic, normal, academic sense in relation to his reference to his own work as 'scholarship'. The alleged 'size' of the audience is just one small detail pointing to the tendency of Peter Staudenmaier to make up things in different directions for different reasons according to his preconceptions. See the links in a former posting. His demonstrably untruthful and slanderous made up story about the basic 'source' he uses to introduce and in the readers anchor the 'story', that constitutes the start of his alleged career as 'scholar' on anthroposophy, simply shows he has not learned to put his demonstrated deep preconceptions aside when approaching the subject. Now he's stuck in rescuing his personal honour, being an added systematical bias that predictably will screw up the whole continued discussion on the subject and his career in the field, being an added source of probable bias in what he writes and will write that has to be counted with, in addition to his former demonstrated unreliability, making any discussion even more complicated, trying to judge the possible truth value of what he writes, as he so fully has demonstrated his unpredictable untruthfulness in in different ways screwing up the sources he refers to. Sune Nordwall
http://hem.passagen.se/thebee/indexeng.htm
http://hem.passagen.se/thebee/comments
|